Can A Prolapsed Uterus Cause Infertility

Weather Sicily and southern Calabria 3/19/2011





unstable conditions in the morning with overcast skies on the Tyrrhenian coast with rain scattered elsewhere always more cloudy with chance of rain.

improves the afternoon on the north of Sicily, partly cloudy in most part of the Reggio Calabria and Messina, Sicily South cloudy even without special events.

the evening the cloud cover increases from west to be the tail of an edge this time without the phenomena associated with more than occasional.

maximum temperatures that reach 18 ° C in Catania and nell'agrigentino, a few degrees less elsewhere. Ventilation with reinforcements from the north west of the Strait of Sicily.

Places In Brampton Hiring For Part Time

National Weather Saturday, March 19, 2011

The extension of the Azores high to the NE, as mentioned above, will leave a gap in Italy baric and this will cause a cold call from the east on Sunday will bring a significant decline sopramedia heat compared to recent days, that obviously creates a temperature drop the resurgence of bad weather due to the thermal contrast between the warm air to the existing soil and cold air coming from north / northeast.

The Saturday so it will be characterized by cloudiness spread over the entire peninsula on the south with light showers, Tuscan-Emilian Apennines and the northern side of the Alps with snow more than 1300 meters, the intensification of the phenomena with possible afternoon showers on the Tyrrhenian Sea and the North with thunderstorms also possible on Sardinia, elevation snow falling sharply in the evening on the north slopes of the Alps to 300/500 meters, sprinkled with snow possible over 900/1000 meters during the night also the Tuscan-Emilian Apennines.

Temperature sensitive decline from late evening to CentroNord.

Weak northerly winds in the morning, getting stronger by NE in the late afternoon especially on medium to high Adriatic and Ligurian Sea.

Mari recently moved with waves rising from the evening on medium / high Adriatic and Ligurian Sea.

-forecast by Stefano Ricci on the basis of WRF Lamma ECMWF 12Z Thursday, March 17.

-Graphics Metwit.net

Gloryholeon Long Island

Weather forecast for Saturday, March 19, 2011 for Triveneto

On Triveneto sky overcast with a chance of rain most likely local or scattered in the foothills and foothills. Snowfall around 1200mt down to below the 1000m in the evening. Accumulations will be insignificant.
minimum temperature stable or slightly down in the plains, a moderate decline in the mountains.
Maximum temperatures in moderate decline in all sectors.
Weak northerly winds tend to rotate from Southwest and strengthen.

Enlarged Stomach Neonatal Ultrasound

from satellite: a national

over Italy last cloudiness on the northeast but rapidly improving and mostly due to winds from north to south of the Alps Clouds
insignificant with the middle, more compact clouds in the south Tyrrhenian versnate with even some rain. On overcast
Sardinia in the western slope and strong wind from the north.

Europe we see a field of high pressure to the west, a weak disturbance over England. The disturbances
more organized flow to northern latitudes and the cold air is going to invest the north of England. A line
perturbed with thunderstorms is covering the whole eastern Mediterranean (Greece and Turkey).

Serendipity Study Bible Online

Weather Forecast Friday, March 18, 2011

Depression still active between the Adriatic and the Balkans that will not fail to residual instability scattered everywhere with the Azores high trying to guardagnare com from the west, even though he will place a little too far north to provide protection to Italy, leaving space at the entrance of fresh streams of Balkan origin who on Sunday will bring a decline in general a little heat on the peninsula, accompanied this decrease heat but it seems very likely a resurgence of bad weather on the center and south could potrarre until March 22/23.

For the day Friday we will have a marked improvement from the west on the north end there as the phenomena mostly at night and gradually broadened from the evening will also extend to the central Tyrrhenian, where every morning the rain will persist even sparse rains that hit a little of everything and the central-islands with even moderate intensity on the sunny Tyrrhenian; snow present center on the north slopes of the eastern Alps and the Dolomites in addition to buttress current 1200/1300 meters from the north.

marked increase in the maximum temperatures in the north where there are mostly located elsewhere.

Light winds from the SW and SE Tirreno Adriatic, rotating from N / NE from the northern basin from the evening, strong Mistral Sea Corsica and Sardinia to the sea down by the evening.

calm seas or slightly wavy almost everywhere with exception of the seas of Corsica and Sardinia to be very agitated or moved with waves , decreasing from the late afternoon.

-forecast by Stefano Riccio based WRF Lamma ECMWF 12Z of Wednesday, March 16.

-Graphics Metwit.net

Where Can I Dip My Rims In Chrome In Phoenix,az

Sicily and southern Calabria 3/18/2011



After the day of the 150th anniversary of 'unification of Italy in the south the weather turns a little the ugly sign that even the general synoptic situation must stabilize. In fact, it appears likely since the beginning of the new week now that the winter will return to the office. It would be cool to be defined un'ennessima on the details. After this brief interlude of the situation and developments in Italy, here's the forecast for March 18, 2011 on Sicily and Calabria low:


the morning, partly cloudy skies and little precipitation anywhere possible on the western Sicilian Tyrrhenian species.

transit of the afternoon rain showers in the north of Sicily as well as the center of Reggio Calabria, the exclusion can not take thunderstorms.

the evening and mostly cloudy with rain possible in always transit in particular on the Tyrrhenian coast. High

that will not go above 18 ° C on Catania, even below 15 ° C in the remaining areas at sea level. Ventilation
moderate from the west across the territory, weak Strait.

Pre Made White Wall Panel For Nursery

weather lombardia for Friday March 18, 2011

Tomorrow sunny weather on lombardia thanks to foehn winds that blow on the plains of Lombardy.

sunny in the morning, except a few layers sopprattutto east, sunny skies elsewhere, except for some fog bank on the south london.

the afternoon, clear skies and very mild climate thanks to the foehn winds that blow on the plains, some cloud over the Rhaetian Alps.

In the evening, clear skies across the region, on the night will come from the west stratified clouds that produranno no phenomenon.

minimum temperature falling to around 5-6 °, and especially in the further increase of around 20-23 °.

Winds in the western lowland weak to moderate with reinforcements from the north on the high plains, moderate northern Alps.

Toyota Corolla Ae102 Engine Swaps

Weather forecast for Friday, March 18, 2011 for Triveneto

Triveneto on time tomorrow there will be mostly sunny with possible fog in the night and early morning on the plains in rapid dissolution. Increased cloudiness without precipitation in the Alps.
In the afternoon the weather will remain unchanged mostly sunny weather.
temperatures slightly lower minimum values, increasing the maximum.
Weak or absent.

What Is Mucus Like When Become Pregnant

Satellite: Weather situation


Italy is still covered by clouds a bit 'everywhere except on Sicily, Calabria, Puglia and the Veneto, where the sky is clear.

By evening, the disturbance will move away permanently from Italy, thus improving weather with latest snowfall in the Western Alps above 1500 meters, and rainfall on the western Lombardy and Piedmont.

Weak SW Sicily, Calabria and Campania.

New York State Dmv Eye Test

Sicily and southern Calabria 3/17/2011




the morning weather with clear skies, except on the last clumps of Reggio Calabria.

the afternoon time is still stable with significant skies clear of clouds.

the evening increases the cloudiness over western Sicily, with possible rain with a tendency to spread to the rest of the island and the Tyrrhenian side Reggina.


Temprerature maximum higher in Catania on 20 ° C, slightly lower values \u200b\u200belsewhere. Ventilation by prevailing west-southwest.

Low Cost Ways To Cover Metal Folding Chairs

weather london on Thursday March 16, 2011

Tomorrow the trough responsible for the heavy storm moves away from Italy yesterday, releasing the sky by the clouds.

Tomorrow morning the sky was still cloudy with rain present Scattered over the plain, and a few light snowfalls in the Alps over 1400metri. In the afternoon

phenomena is still scattered clouds in the eastern plains sopprattutto, yet the latest snowfall in the Alps.

In the evening a bit cheers' everywhere, went back to the serene on almost all of Lombardy with the risk of formation of some bank of fog on the lowlands.

minimum temperature falling in the range of 6-8 degrees, especially in the increase between 14-16 °.

plain weak winds in the Western Alps by weak-moderate north.

Converting To Aautomatic Start Gas Fireplace

National Weather Thursday, March 17, 2011 Forecast for

The structure we are interested in low pressure will be disappearing for days now closed by the provision of a bridge Weijkoff dell'anticlicone Azores all'anticiclone joint Scandinavian, but will still have time to bring bad weather with rain showers until Saturday, while the weekend There should be accompanied by an improvement in thermal cooler coming from the east.

bad weather on the north with rain showers mainly affecting areas and Alpine foothills, rainfall only at drizzle low or absent between Liguria and the Po Valley, snow over 1500 meters, over 1800 in the Dolomites.

center on bad weather with heavy rainfall especially on the Tyrrhenian coast in the afternoon, overcast skies but little rain on the Adriatic side, the possible return of a few sprinkling of snow on the highest peaks of the Northern Apennines.

On the south and iosole bad weather with rain and thunderstorms in Campania and Sardinia, clouds of little significance or peaceful elsewhere.

Temperature steady or slightly declining everywhere.

Moderate winds from the south with rinforsi Libeccio of the southern Tyrrhenian Sea.

Mari wavy, locally moderate the Tyrrhenian sea.

-forecast by Stefano Riccio based WRF Lamma ECMWF 12Z of Tuesday, March 15.

-Graphics Metwit.net

Birthday Party At Cineplex Odeon In Brampton

Triveneto for Thursday, March 17, 2011

The situation on the Triveneto tends to improve slowly due to the shift of the disruption to the east.

the morning to overcast skies throughout the country with rain and snow at altitudes around 1400mt and locally at lower altitudes in the case of intense rain. In the early afternoon to begin termination of the phenomena from the west with some bright spells, while the rest of the territory still rains especially in the Friuli Venezia Giulia with more snow on the Alps since the evening cessation of phenomena across the rest of the Venetian plain and continuous rains spread on foothills and Friuli Venezia Giulia with the latest snowfall on the mountains.

minimum temperature falling too moderate on the plains, especially in the general rise in the plain, stable in the mountains.

winds from the southeast but still decreasing.

Looking For Cheap For Durg Called Zyzanse

from satellite: a

Italy is almost completely covered by the disruption, with the exception of Sicily, Sardinia west. Some opening up of Calabria and Puglia.
The disruption is also dispensing abundant rains and snowfall in the Alps at altitudes around 1300-1500m.
The situation does not improve soon with more rain intensified in the north and center before attenuation provided by this evening to start from the west.
There is the possibility of thunderstorms on the Tyrrhenian and the north with local hail.
Bad weather is linked to depression located between the Riviera and Corsica in moving towards the east that will lead to an intensification of the winds from the southeast and Tirreno Adriatico.

Pregnancy Pink Tinged Mucus

Weather Sicily and southern Calabria 3/16/2011





Forecast for Sicily and Calabria low with extensive cloudiness and rain with sunny spells and scattered mainly temporary low-intensity.

the evening breaks the cold front on the Palermo and Trapani, where showers are not mutually exclusive and unchanged elsewhere temporali.Situazione

the night time in the gradual and partial improvement. Occasional rain front post everywhere.

Horatio Alger Scholarship Do Lower Income Have

london weather forecast for Wednesday March 16




WARNING BAD WEATHER ON THE LOMBARDY TOMORROW: Tomorrow, the trough will move east, bringing with them an intense disturbance that will cause heavy storm on lombardia with moderate rainfall across the plains and foothills, rainfall will be more insistent on the foothills in the morning, some storms can also on the western plain in the morning snowfall over 1600-1700 meters, down to the evening 1400metri.

the afternoon even moderate rainfall throughout the region will become more intense with snowfall in the Alps.

attenuation phenomena in the night a bit 'everywhere, even if there is still the possibility of some weak scattered rain squall. minimum temperature increase of 1-2 ° and maximum decrease of around 12-13 degrees.

winds in the eastern lowland weak to moderate - Moderate Southern Alps.

Windows Live Won't Detect Cam

national Wednesday, March 16, 2011

What Colour Goes With Burgundy

On the Old Testament and the genuine lie

This post is a continuation of the topics covered in the first part of the blog and not in continuity with the past issues of social and political mold.

To understand what Christianity is necessary to analyze its roots, which lie in Judaism, and Judaism are the sources we have gathered in the Old Testament. So the problem will move first on this collection of texts: those who wrote them? Who translated them and how? Have changed over time?
The first thing to say about the Scriptures is that the originals were in ancient Hebrew, a language without vowels and spacing between words. Not being in possession of the originals, probably destroyed with the conquest of the Babylonians, and having no grammar, we will find it impossible to definitively verify the accuracy of the translation of texts, either in the Masoretic (Hebrew vocalized a) is in the version of the Septuagint (in greek). All that remains is to keep them an attitude of skepticism, even just thinking about the fact that writing without spaces and vowels are open to much ambiguity, although it may appeal to the context. For example, the phrase "man shot" becomes "lmspr" which, vocalized, can be misinterpreted "man part". The counter-argument that raising the worshipers of the Bible is that in fact every word is fully deductible from the context and there are no ambiguities. So let us take as an example the first words of Genesis, which tradition says that these are "bereshit Barà Elohim", meaning "in the beginning God created." It 'the only possible reading? Not at all. You can also read "ab Reshit Barà Elohim," and that "the Father of the beginning created the gods" (or "God", depending on how you want to interpret the plural) or "barosh itbarà Elohim," "God in the mind will create itself. " It seems obvious that each of these three readings offers a completely different interpretation key from the others. What's true we can say on the Old Testament is not about its content, but the fact that the interpretation depended on the dominant philosophical belief of Masoretes, who voiced the Old Testament in a long process ended at about the tenth century AD.
Even the authors and the authenticity of the writings there are great doubts. Almost everything that the tradition ascribes to Moses in reality is the work of Ezra and his priestly class, who were re-found Jewish identity on mythic roots after the liberation from slavery in Babylon, which ended by the intervention of the Persians in the sixth and the fifth century BC. The authenticity is proved by the fact that narrated story of the death of Moses, much later, until the period in which he lived Ezra. Also, other books, including those of the prophets, may not be autographed. The Book of Daniel, for example, has been repeatedly stated as inauthentic: Uriel Da Costa considers self-righteous work, Spinoza believes that while there have been additions of mold Sadducees (the current conservative opposed to the Pharisees). Unfortunately we can only provide evidence to show the falsity of the traditional beliefs, but nothing we can say with certainty about the real authors: in fact, nothing is known about the history of the texts considered sacred.
But what these books teach? Mainly two things:

1) the fear and respect of God, taught by threats of dire punishment and promises of great wealth;
2) some moral rules of common sense and good conduct relevant to the conservation of society.

These two points are in fact inextricably linked, since the laws were attributed directly to God, and their observance depended proportionally by the faith of each.
All this is immediately clear from the story of Moses. Rescued Jews from slavery in Egypt, is now faced another problem: give the people what political organization, and how to enforce it? The ambition of everyone to govern or a refusal to be governed by peers was the largest problem for the conservation and stability of the new company. Recall that Deuteronomy was written by Ezra, or else by priests close to him, whose purpose was to give a mythical and glorious foundation of the Jewish people, who come to terms even with God himself:

"The Lord has established with us in Horeb " (deuter. 5.2)

The intent of Scripture is not historiography, but to inspire wonder and devotion in those who heard or read. Here, then, that you begin to explain the laws to be followed by the Jewish people, beginning with the reverence for the divine authority:

"have no other gods in front of me. You shall not make an idol or any likeness of what is in heaven above, or what is the earth beneath, nor of what is in the water under the earth. You shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation for those who hate me " (deuter. 5:7-9).

In all likelihood, the Jewish people being divided into numerous tribes, each had to have his own patron god. In order to unify the people you must first unify the worship this God who was to be adored by everyone is the same one that freed the Jews from Egypt, as they say in Deuteronomy just above 5.6 ( "I am the Lord your God who brought you out of the land of Egypt, from slavery" ), and there is no reason not to worship a God who has extremely powerful and very dear to his people, this speech was to exercise a strong degree of persuasion on the Volga, which puts more attention on the wonders and the threats which do not, for example, in phrases like " I am a jealous God, "just divine and very human attribute.
The other commandments moral precepts that are not targeted to the social and coated with the force of a divine decree, so as to be respected by all for fear of punishment and the hope of reward:

"Honor your father and your mother ... Thou shalt not kill. You shall not commit adultery. Do not steal. Do not bear false witness against your neighbor. You shall not covet your neighbor's wife. You shall not covet your neighbor's house, nor his field, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor " (deuter. 5, 17 -21).

The power that Moses exercised here is no different from the kings of antiquity. In order to maintain order and rule over the people was necessary to proclaim each demigod or voice of God on earth. Moses does the same thing: it gives a code of laws to His people and claims that have been dictated directly by God, manifested in the form of fire.
Now, identifying a jew in the time of Ezra, we may ask: but why Moses should speak for God? If God loves his people and his kingdom is that of Israel, why does not manifest itself openly to all the people? This idea is subversive, because it brings into question the legitimacy of the foundation of the Jewish theocratic state. The authority of Moses can not be questioned in any way. So then, later, it tells a true founding myth, a justification fantastic direct to the people that legitimates the established order:

"heard the voice through the darkness, while the mountain was on fire, your chiefs and your old men all came to me and said, Behold, the Lord our God has shown us his glory and his greatness and we have heard his voice from the fire, we have seen today that God can speak to the man and the man to stay alive. But now, why should we die? This great fire will consume us if we hear the voice of the Lord our God shall die. Because who among all mortals like us have heard the voice of the living God speaking from the fire and remained alive? Go near and listen to what the Lord our God will say, we refer to as the Lord our God and we have told you the hear and do it. The Lord heard your words as I spoke, and said: I heard the words he has addressed this people, what they said OK " (deuter. 5, 23-28).

The message is roughly this: the people have already heard the voice of God in the past, proving the truth of what was said by Moses. But it can no longer hear, or he will die, only Moses, or whoever he may be the interpreter, because only those who showed to hear the word of God will continue to do so without consequences. Even a few lines above, it reinforces the concept:

"The Lord spoke face to face on the mountain from the fire, I stood between the Lord and you, the word of the Lord, because you were afraid of the fire and not go up the mountain " (deuter. 5, 4-5).

The importance of this founding myth is enormous because it shows with the greatest evidence that the function of religion was purely political in origin, and therefore later revealed religions (Christianity and Islam) are not that different interpretations of a false doctrine but functional for the Jewish state. We must remember that the Jews of that time the prize was not divine heaven, but mundane and practical rewards, and the Kingdom of God is not synonymous with "Kingdom of Heaven", but "Kingdom of Israel."
I will try to convince the reader suggesting a parallel with another founding myth: that found in Plato's Republic.
The Republic is divided into ten books and his subject of research is justice. In this long discussion, however, Plato presents what for him would be the ideal model was essentially divided into three classes: the guardians (ie leaders) symbolized by gold, silver are the warriors, and workers, whose element is bronze. As for Moses, Plato also has the problem of how to accept and maintain such a state of affairs. The philosopher in the third book of the Republic proposes a "genuine lie" to inculcate in the people, with the order to maintain the social division:

"How did we then to believe a lie genuine ... the rulers themselves, or the rest of the city?
[...]
first try to persuade the rulers themselves and the soldiers, then the rest of the city, had the impression that they receive all the spiritual and physical education imparted to us as it happened in a dream around them, but in reality at that time were molded and educated in the bosom of the earth, they, their weapons and the rest of their equipment already ready-made and when they were fully formed the earth, which was their mother, took them to light. To this must now provide for the land they live in and defend it as their mother and nurse, if someone moves against it, and consider other citizens as brothers and sisters were also born from the earth. " "Not without reason," he said, "before you were ashamed to utter this lie." "And I had good reason," I replied. "But listen to the rest of the myth. You people are all brothers, we tell them the story continues, but the gods, plasma, at the time of birth has imbued gold in as many of you are likely to govern, and therefore they have the highest quality, has instilled in the auxiliary of 'silver, farmers and other artisans in iron and bronze. Since you are all in the same race, you can usually produce children like you, but in some cases can be born offspring from gold and silver from silver offspring of gold, and so on to a metal ' more. Rulers, then the deity imposes, as the first and most important commandment, not to guard anybody and do not monitor as closely as their children, to find out which metal has been mixed in their souls, and if their offspring born of mixed bronze or iron, must dismiss without mercy among the artisans or farmers, giving it the rank that compete with its nature. If, instead they give birth to a child with a vein of gold or silver, will reward him by lifting the rank of guardian or helper, because according to an oracle the city will be ruined when the guard a guard of iron or bronze ... " (Plato, Republic III, 414b-415c).

Basically you need to Plato, the purpose of social conservatives, who tell a lie "noble", which gives a divine origin to the social division of the state, so that everyone accepts their role and is not driven by ambition personal. It 'pretty obvious the analogy with the above-cited passage from Deuteronomy: the fear of death risk of authorizing a certain social class (before Moses and the Levites, then, at the beginning, led by Aaron) to legislate, and ambitions each should be abandoned in the beginning, as God commands. Among other things, there is a strong analogy between the class of Levites and the Guardians of Plato, both were released from work, could not own land but were retained by the people and had to deal with the law.
The big difference between the Platonic myth and that the Decalogue is that the former is admittedly false, the second is presented as true by various statements, but this is only due to the fact that the lie tied to the myth of the Decalogue is operational and has actually worked (maybe even better than expected), while Plato is just a connection that must be improved:

"Know, then some way to convince them of that myth?" To convince them, "he said," Absolutely not, if anything, to convince their children and descendants and posterity in general " (Plato, Republic III, 415c).

That is to say, maybe the first that will hear will not believe you, but if you teach to their children and to their children's children, will certainly a truth as indisputable (the spread and persistence of a certain religion in a given area follows this principle).
I think I have shown, with the help of the Republic of Plato, that the Jewish religion is based on a lie in the time required for the creation and preservation state, and in fact, extending this principle, the whole Jewish religion is a lie built for social and political consequence of Christianity and Islam are religions as false as the Jewish, because their roots lie in this. In addition, given the scriptures unambiguously translatable can not be considered "sacred" a translation of them, also taking into account that have been modified over time in several places and the authors are not, in many cases, those assigned by tradition.
By virtue of what has been concluded so far, the Bible is devoid of all authority and its only value lies in what concerns the history and mythology.

Sylwia Pielecka Nowa Fantastyka

Capitalism and political actions are necessary and desirable

With the revolutions in America and France, the West moved the first step toward modern democracy. The nobility was swept away in the huge enclosed and states began to separate the political powers to eliminate the figure of the king, who embodied the ideal gentleman.

The project succeeded in part. Today, in states like Italy, it happens that although there is no longer a king, parliament, the representative body of citizens, is peopled by characters who over time have used their power due to numerous privileges and to change the rules to their advantage. The task of the parliament should be to enact laws for the people and take care of the needs of the state: now (at least in Italy) is the place where we took refuge to escape the hand of justice and to ensure a princely salary and pension .

However, even where democracy seems truly democratic, there is something abnormal. And 'my firm belief that one can not understand anything about today's society if you do not count, along with legislative, executive and judicial powers, including the economic one. In our time, the economic power has a prominent role than the other three and radically affects the behavior, but to say that way he does and what affects the lives of men should explain what.

In modern society the power of an individual is determined by how much money they have. Money is just the power of conventional units that can carry a man on the society to which it belongs: the economic power is the sum of money you have, and coincides with the power.

The rules of the capitalist appropriation of money are those that govern the entire world (with few exceptions not significant) since the fall of the USSR began with the riots of 1989.

The mechanism basis of the capitalist economy is this: having a certain amount of money, called capital, you can buy a certain quantity of goods, which in turn can be sold at a higher price than it cost, and this determines the profit. The initial cost of the goods is determined by several factors: spending on raw materials, labor power, for any equipment for the electricity, to purchase a building in which to produce, and so on. Once produced the goods, this will have a price that will be the sum of production costs plus the profit determined by the capitalist, that is, who pays the costs of production. With this mechanism, any capital increase by himself, his own entity. The ultimate goal of capitalism is precisely that of an indefinite increase of the capital itself, which results in the continuous pursuit of maximum profit. The enormous increase of wealth should ensure as a side effect on social welfare. In fact, large supply of capital means wide availability of goods for the people.

All this has serious repercussions on society. First, the entrepreneur has to deal with competition. To increase profits can not raise prices too much, or not to sell his wares. Must save money on production costs, leaving the goods at the price that the market requires. Now, what it means to save on production costs? Exploitation of cheap labor, without regard extraction of raw materials from the environment, pollution conscious and so on. Because honestly, that way, it seems a very indifferent, I feel obliged to cite an example that convinced of the truth of what has been said.

As for the cheap labor the matter is clear for us Italians, just think of the immigrants who pick tomatoes for a few euro and the Chinese who support working hours unthinkable. For multinationals, but the same holds true on a global scale: they bring in the work were very poor as Vietnam and sweatshops of the population for some penny. Some might argue that at least take work where there is only poverty. But I did not use the word "exploit" by chance: for one thing, the International Labour Organisation has estimated that only in developing countries 190 million working children aged between five and fourteen shared between Africa, Asia and America South, of which approximately 12 million work for industry. There are numerous documented cases of unhealthy working conditions, sexual abuse, inhuman hours and, needless to say, starvation wages (the names are always the same: Adidas, Nike, clothing industries, etc.). Any rebellion or trade union activity is suppressed in the bud.

Same speech to environmental conditions. Eni in 2006 voluntarily compensated the families of Syracuse who had malformed children because of mercury pollution between 1991 and 1993. This too is part of the logic of profit, someone should make good every now and then invest that money to lose in wastewater treatment plants. In the poorest parts of the world, the situation is even more dramatic because there are no reflectors and focused organizational measures to enforce the law (if there are, can do nothing or almost against the multinational giants.) Staying within Eni, in 2005 it was found that in Ecuador, near oil pumping station where they were farmland and pastures, the level of hydrocarbon contamination was five times higher than the limit allowed by law. Not only that those same lands have been the victim of "black rain" due to residual gas burned in the pumping station. This and many other cases are evidence that the indiscriminate search of profit is the enemy of humanity. The same mafia world are nothing but the most cynical expression and mechanics of capitalism.

congenital The other feature of the current economy is that, to increase your profitability, you need to increase consumption. Hence the widespread use of disposable and goods that perish easily. In real society, capitalism leads to growth exponential consumption of the goods and then created, and some exchange this wealth for social welfare. Not so: the logic of consumption, as well as being the source of many physical and psychological illness, is ravaging the planet. It should be noted that in the face of the rise of consumption there is an exponential increase in the extraction of raw materials, and raw material reserves are limited. Oil, as well as the gas is running out: it is estimated that within 50 years will end. Then maybe it will begin to extract uranium and uranium after, something else, until there will be nothing under your feet. The renewable energy sources rather have a big flaw: they are not monopolized. No one can own the sun, wind, heat from the Earth, the force of the tides. These energies do not bring high profits to energy industries, and not an alternative to hydrocarbons.

recap: the current economic mechanism is a destructive process is from the man who respect the planet. In his sights is not the Man but the capital, and this can only bring discomfort and social injustice for all, including the richest, who are slaves to this mechanism as much as a worker who extracted tantalum mines in Zaire ( the current Democratic Republic of Congo). It 's a dehumanizing process that satisfied the gentleman who wants to possess a yacht, but refuses to answer those who have no money to prevent AIDS or to support their families.

to dispel a myth about capitalism is the "anyone can become rich." Except for some extraordinary exception, the rich become richer and the poor remain poor. The large capital can easily be multiplied through the establishment of the bag: you can buy the debt, invest in stocks that yield important interests, make money by betting on the failure of companies or entire countries. Obviously those who are not in possession of huge amounts of capital is cut off from all this, and swell the ranks of the army of workers. UN agency called UNU-Wider calculated that, with some unavoidable margin of error, 85% of the world's private wealth is held by 10% of the adult population. This is a significant fact that makes us understand how excessive wealth in reality will rest on someone else's poverty. Moreover, if there were no poor people there would be nobody willing to work in slavery conditions for foreign companies, who may not maximize profits. Poverty in the village is an essential characteristic and essential to obtain low-cost labor force and to make possible a great richness in some areas (such as the European or American). Poverty is an inescapable consequence of capitalism.

Because money gives power, individuals who have in large amounts can fold directly or indirectly, the political power to their advantage. To cite an obvious case, and we close in time: the war in Iraq was done because it was believed that Saddam Hussein had hidden weapons of mass destruction for use against the West. It was clearly a lie, and in fact were never found. The truth is that oil is running out and the last reserves are located in the Middle East, Iraq's economic policy was hostile to the United States, and so they have intervened militarily to change the government. Now they have won for the oil companies in a strategic area Middle East.

Modern democracies are in fact completely in the hands of capitalists. The people believe they can vote for a candidate who carries out different things from the other parties, but in reality anyone who represents the political power is a subject of economic power. In large countries like the United States, each of the two candidates (one Republican and one Democrat) is the lobby of economic power, and whoever is elected will have to respond to them before the public. If politics is populated by butlers of capitalists, then it is impossible to oppose the dehumanizing all'incedere economy. For example, it is impossible that the policy puts a ceiling on wealth or heavily taxed higher incomes, as men should do so intertwined with the capitalists. Let alone make any kind of tax on financial speculation ... pure fiction (see Tobin Tax).

Often when they do not obey the economy, politics legislates for itself: pensions, salaries, reimbursements, invulnerability by the judiciary and so on. When you get to this point, the democratic pact is effectively dissolved, and it is the duty of people to regain the its parliament. This is not an act of anti-democratic, far from it. In fact, if it happens that politicians

• deal themselves in government buildings;

• promulgated several laws that provide substantial privileges for themselves;

• do everything to stay in office by changing parties as underwear;

• immunize you from the executive;

• open the doors of parliament to corrupt men;

then it is necessary that the entire nation will rise up and deal with the institutional order to restore true democracy. The problem of the use of violence should not even be there because the police should defend democracy, and the uprising of the people occurs in the absence of it.

which should play the role of democracy in our times is to curb the economic power. It is to demand respect for individual freedoms, to put a limit on continuous net accumulation of wealth to redistribute evenly among the citizens, to tax speculative transactions and so on. It is not the man who must obey the economy but the economy is that the man must have an end. Economic issues can no longer be a matter only of economists, given that the coin touches virtually every aspect of human life, from the psyche to relations between nations. Philosophers, psychologists, scientists all have a say in regard to the economy. You must come to understand the mechanism of capitalism seemingly unstoppable actually works only with our consent. And the consent may be revoked at any time, provided that we do together.

As long as the policy will be occupied by men in the hands of economic power or, worse, rotten and corrupt men, none of what is hoped will be over. And then we wait for a more frightening future generations, where wealth is increasingly concentrated in few hands and the rest of the world's population will have to fight wars for the latest sources energy left, will fight against the shortage of food and water caused by desertification, will be the victim of outbreaks due to overcrowding and conditions of extreme poverty a part of it. The advantage is that the current generation has the opportunity to do something epic that will remain in history and that could change the fate of the planet, but we must do it now, or it may be too late.

If you want to take note of the failure of democracy, it is necessary to talk about alternative forms of society. Personally I hope that you will reread with the eyes of modern thinkers such as Nietzsche, Proudhon, Bakunin and Stirner. Their critical reading could lead to update anarchist theories of society are very interesting. Obviously anarchism is not what the populace thinks or think that is done, ie return to a state of "animal." Quite the contrary, men should organize themselves into free associations, each with its own rules and its responsibilities, and all interconnected by a network of relationships. The boundaries of the states would fall and crumble state power. The means of producing the goods belong to the individual associations in which they are used, the police would no longer exist, but any violations would be punished in accordance with rules established by the association. Thus abolishing the central political power of the state (each association set its own law) and economic power (due to the commonality of the means of production), the man will be fully master of its own destiny.

Can I Fly If My Driver' License Is Expired?

a horizon on the foundations of society and the communist ideology

The men, considered in relation to their peers, are divided into two categories:

• who exercises a power;

• who suffers a power.

The distinction between these categories is never clear. No one always has power and no one suffers alone. Since every person can exercise the power in principle on all material objects (as these are passive by nature), then the exercise of power in humans results in their objectification.

Conceptually, the two major categories derive the two fundamental archetypes of society: the ideal servant, who suffers only the power but not pursuing anything, and the perfect gentleman, never the other way round is not subject to the power and exercised it only. This in reality translates into intricate relationships and alternative worship and servitude, but in principle we can identify with the word "servant" who does not exercise almost no power and with the word "sir" not the one who has almost never. The number of servants is directly proportional to the power of the Lords.

Lords may exercise the power on serve in two main ways: reducing them to slavery or placing of their work. Slavery consist in whole or in part of the will of the servant who takes over that of the lord, and may in turn be expressed or implied in the first case, the man turns out to be infinitely powerful and the servant surrenders voluntarily or is forced to do (think of the great pharaohs and kings) in the second, took over powerful tools that affect The special will also unconsciously (this is the case, for example, advertising). Since the work is an activity that generates a tangible or intangible product, the lord can exert power on the servo appropriating the fruits of his labor. The appropriation may be paid, and that is where the ladies realized its power over money and updates his majesty owning a product, or unpaid, such as those farmers who are required by law to donate a certain amount for the nobility maintain it.

Under the definitions given so far, almost exclusively those who have enough power to procure the commodities will be served for the most of the time, while those who can take possession of secondary assets, will be considered luxuries and riches sir. It is obvious that slavery as defined summarizes the lower classes of every historical period. Their power is limited in practice to stay alive to continue to work, and work to stay alive. What little power that could be used to advance the goal of escaping temporarily to their status: the abuse of alcohol or drugs that sapped the self-consciousness, gambling, and through the imagination illusion of being gentlemen, or situations of units group in general such as typhoid or stage a mass in the church, where the homogeneity of the identity of the crowd dissolve the particularity of the individual.

A separate discussion deserve the media, especially television. Its role is twofold: on one hand makes the viewer identification with the passive role of women (through shows, movies, scenes of opulence deceptively accessible, etc.), the other always keeps alive the fear of social disorder and convinces the viewer that the society is the best possible for those who are not at the top of the social ladder (the means are: crime, images of riots, epidemics, charities, etc.). It also encourages the process of dissolution of individuality within a group identity with the transmission of football, pounding programs that expose to public contempt of the criminal characters, and so on, are all fictions designed where you try and you initiate a position by the viewer, perhaps by people who claim to speak or opinion (whether intentionally or unintentionally) the unbearable, so as to facilitate the choice of which faction to side without having to raise any critical process. The discussions are consistently on the superficial aspects, and language is very simple, so that the viewer can now choose which group to belong, and exchange for this freedom is not aware of being in a cage.

These three elements, making losing the viewer with the right knowledge of self and the world around him, allowing very effectively to maintain the status quo in society. And 'necessary fact that impose stability by all means, because in itself does not exist: in particular if a huge power is concentrated in the hands of a few and many are forced to live in servitude, the discontent will lead to violent riots and reversals of social status in a basically cyclical.

The exercise of power is for each structural political and economic system that history has ever known, without exception, and we can reasonably say that it is congenital essential for human beings: the man is will to power and his social life is a response to the need to exercise this power.

But what about communism? In its various forms, is to essentially the goal of elimination of the rule, in so doing, they would be less inequality and thus social conflict. The result should be a peaceful society and socially flat, in which no one can exercise power. Of course, would be abolished also the lowest forms of worship such as the ownership of primary goods, which are instead owned, rationed and distributed by the state. A communist state should only produce goods needed, eliminating what is purely noble: the surplus (or appropriation of property, excessive) and the superfluous (such luxuries).

In some respects the ideal communist society reminiscent of Sparta in ancient Greece:

• no Spartan could accumulate wealth or luxuries (which indeed they were despised);

• ate in community and every citizen belonged to a table that was supposed to help bring the fruits of labor of the fields that had (in the municipality are not provided for landowners, but it is significant that each put Shared products of their land);

• the life of every citizen was covered and perfectly punctuated by the collective life and duties to the polis (discounting, to the state, we think the Soviet Union, but also to other totalitarian regimes of 900).

But Spartan society in the exercise of power was admitted, the helots, ie slaves, doing the most menial raising their lords, that the free citizens of Sparta, from the state of servitude. It follows that civil society was formed by a group of gentlemen equivalent (or equal ) that did not carry power between them.

Communist ideology maintains and extends the equality extends to all men in order to eradicate the exercise of power, and keeps their total subordination to the state.

However, there is need for someone to produce the goods necessary for survival under universal equality everyone must provide, in various ways, their work. The products of this work, since the power has been abolished, it is not for one rather than another, therefore, become property of the state that redistributes them equally to the citizens. From this follow two crucial observations:

• every citizen is well within the logic of "work to live and live to work" of his servant, as it works, does not own his work and receive only what is necessary;

• the communist state is lord over his people as has the work and life of every citizen (repressing the initiative, freedom, the will to power, etc.).

So the most logical outcome of communism is to create a nation of slaves. Also behind the word "state" is hiding the dictatorship of the Communist Party, and that we know both from theory (even Marx foresaw, but even if he had not granted and it is obvious that a company already in its anti-human conditions could only be achieved by brute force) and by the practice (the USSR is the clearest example for us Europeans). The madness of ideology as usual led to mass deportations, massacres, repression, oppression, forced labor and so on. And all this in the name of equality, justice and social peace.

Returning to the master-slave dialectic: a common feature of many gentlemen is that the more exercise a great power willing to exercise a greater extent. In other words, the more satisfying their instinctual drives, the more these you are big and wasteful. The Lord has attracted and fascinated by the figure of the gentleman ideal, although this attraction is not in need. The groped to embody it leads to a fatal self-destructive spiral: the aim to dispose of the world, to objectify anything to break the moral law, civil and criminal corrodes itself up to destroy it. The man is alienated from himself, he becomes a machine hungry for pleasures that wanders astray without ever finding contentment. What about the ladies then alienated except that it is slave of his passions and his greed? The increase in proportion to the power port to become the lord servant of his own power. And a capacity large enough to be inevitably self-destructive harms the society in which it is located. To defend itself should advance to ensure that the power of an individual does not increase beyond a certain limit within which there is a substantial balance and a harmonious alternation of lordship and bondage in every citizen. If you can not reach this situation, then the easement should not necessarily be seen as a negative moment, but as a mutual self-giving to another. Here is another essential aspect that emerges along with the human will to power: the pursuit of love. "Love" is obviously not to be understood in its specific forms such as falls in love, but how universal the push that makes us everyone feel part of a unit root, which can be enclosed by the concept of brotherhood.

Specifically, each individual should give up the lure and attraction that generates the rule absolute, without chasing it (the Spartans despised excessive wealth wisely). If you blindly indulge their passions to self-destruction, everyone should work to ensure that its action was caused by a thought really free from the bondage of the passions and trying to act as a master of self. But even in the ego, as in society, one can not help but think of the servitude must be guaranteed a harmonious alternation between rational irrational and that the individual is healthy and pursue their own good. The domain of one of two things makes men partial and therefore unable to realize himself, while the mean places man in harmony with oneself and with society.

How To Build A Searl Generator

on the Holy Scriptures and the teaching about the alleged religious signs for a different model of thinking

We have seen that those who have faith, or is naive enough or is not interested in the truth. With a fast-paced world, full of pain, evil, mutability, religion offers an attractive place of beauty, peace and eternal life. Everyone likes a place, but unfortunately not just inventing something from scratch to be able to assert the existence and say that there is an entity that is the word of God is not a valid argument, as the word of God was written by men and there is no evidence that God inspired the writing of men. On the contrary, everything suggests that the scriptures are the work of men only. The two key tests are:

1. were written by men and not God;

2. by virtue of the perfection of creation and its timeless essence, God can not be addressed at a particular moment in history to change its course in any way.

Point (1) makes us reflect on the fact that often contradict the claims of Christianity means to prove the obvious. Specifically, you have to show that some texts produced by some men were just written by men, not by a divine entity that contradictory in some way unknown to them has "inspired". So, if the texts were written by A, and we can not verify that A is in no way been influenced by a deity, these texts must have been written by A itself and its own without the intervention of other bodies.

Some may argue that the influence is obvious in the sanctity of the divine messages that contain these records. This is true of some parts of the Bible (such as those concerning universal love), but false for others. If you are not in bad faith can not pretend not to see: in the sacred texts There are undoubtedly some share inciting phallocentrism, others showing a God belligerent, others show that the vengeful, but then identify it with love. Who reads the Bible can not help but feel bewildered about the true essence of God: these attributes, such as the belligerence towards other peoples, are actually divine? And is typical of the divine make contradictory statements?

The cunning stunt of the theologian notes that

c1) the parties objectively best sacred texts can be attributed the influence of the deity, while bad ones are caused by the unfortunate intervention of man, which is inevitably the slave of the values \u200b\u200bof the time in which they live.

likely would be more honest and say that the authors of sacred texts, while being imbued with the values \u200b\u200bof the time in which they lived, they did carry a revolutionary message in that historical moment, as it happens from time to time. But to refute conclusively (c1) be the point (2). Given that "inspire the sacred text" means doing something at a particular moment in history, the argument can be carried out as follows:

a) God is eternal, therefore out of time;

b) God created all things according to his will, as established by the Christian dogmas;

c) the will of God is infallible;

then d) everything is created exactly as God wanted it;

it follows that e) God can not and must not intervene in history, because it is outside of time and because all creation is already at his will, as provided in the instant of creation. It would not make sense to act (the will) in history, which is already coinciding with the divine, in order to change it. So what is written in the Bible is the result solely of the intellect and the pen of some men.

From the above, it is clear that the only useful (if you can call it) of Christianity is to provide an easy consolation for earthly ills. But there is another on purely pragmatic than generally is recognized: that of

(MP) training to the community and enforce a certain ethics.

If a person is of violent nature, a Christian education should soothe her, and if anyone has the urge to steal or kill, the Christian precepts should divert him from his wicked purposes.

E 'obvious to anyone that this is not true. Even St. Thomas in the middle of 1200 wrote that those who contravene the laws should be punished:

" ... there are plenty of rebels and those inclined to vice, that can not be easily moved by words, it was necessary to depict them from evil by force and by fear, to quiet the other ... making life [...]."

In Western history examples that demonstrate the falsity of (MP) are almost endless, but perhaps nothing is as eloquent as what happened between 1300 and 1600, the period of maximum activity of the Holy Inquisition tribunal established by the Church of Rome with the aim of suppressing heresy. After the bulls "Super illius specula" of John XXII and "summis desiderantes affectibus" of Innocent VIII, the Church officially recognizes the existence of witchcraft (the first of them in clerical circles was very skeptical about it) and order as demonic practice, allowing you to use the Inquisition any method to convert the alleged followers of Satan.

before mentioning the methods used in those years to the fight against witchcraft, it is worth quoting a passage from the Malleum Maleficarum, which is a kind of witch-hunting manual, written by Kramer and Sprenger, two Dominican active in Central and inquisitors of 1400. The passage is significant with regard to the Christian concept of the woman at the time:

" ... women are more inclined to believe, and the devil, which seek primarily to corrupt the faith, the more easily able to attack them. Saith the Preacher: who's heart is easy to trust even more light will fall down. [...]

... have the lewd language and can not keep them hidden from other women like the bad things they have learned, and when you do not have enough forces to take revenge, easily try to get revenge with a stench of evil [...]

The woman, bad by nature, falls in early doubts about faith, quickly denied the faith itself, and this is the real basis of evil. Since then, the second faculty of the soul, that is the will, the woman, when taken by hatred of someone who loved the first, burning with anger and impatience, and shake, and boil the sea boils like .. . it all depends on carnal lust, which in women is insatiable, to busy themselves with the demons in order to satisfy their lust. "

not surprising that most of the victims of the Inquisition were women.

was easy to drag someone to court inquisitorial: village often had only a rumor or accusation of one man to justify the torture of an ill-fated.

Torture was no doubt intended to extort a confession of heresy, but frequently, if not in all cases, it served mainly to satisfy the libido sadistic inquisitors' (sadism is a manifestation of deviant sexuality that is pleasure from causing pain and humiliation in another subject). These figures were reached in the years in which they operated, power and tremendous influence, thanks to the terrific fame who had deservedly earned. We know that Don Francisco Tirregon, one of the three inquisitors of Aragon, under the pretext of heresy was to kidnap teenage girls to his men, bent their will by showing the instruments of torture and abuse them. When the French took Aragon and liberated the prisoners of the Inquisition, they were surprised to see, among those, about sixty young and beautiful girls. One of them said that:

• each of the three interrogators had for years a group of kidnapped girls, each locked in a room with no possibility of escape;

• the inquisitor to which they belonged regularly abused each of them, and who became pregnant and give birth without being deprived of the child, who vanished into thin air;

• each year, 6 or 7 girls were replaced by new recruits (do not know if they were killed or removed).

The methods of torture, and the arrangements that were taking an almost scientific precision. In order to continue the torture, he was always careful not to kill the tortured, even lending him aid when he suffered injuries that could be fatal. The methods used were mainly three:

• the shakes: the victim's wrists were tied with a rope passed through a pulley hanging from the ceiling, and ankles with a rope attached to a large weight. By pulling the rope through the pulley, the man was lifted from the ground with all the weight attached to the ankles, the rope was suddenly gone and then taken before the weight touches the ground. The result was that the body was literally stretched due to the combined action of the rope, thereby imparting a force on the wrist opposite to the motion, blocking the free fall, and the weight attached to the ankles, being in free fall, pulled to down. In most cases were found dislocation and loss of consciousness;

• the stand: he was a machine which was used to pull the limbs of a man to dislocate or even tears;

• water torture: it is known in several variants, but the purpose that unites them is to provoke a strong sense of suffocation, with subsequent collapse of the capillaries in the effort to breathe. One of these variants of the heretic was to plug the nose and make him drink water in large quantities.

If these means, though not invented, they were used largely by Christian scholars, it means that Christianity has not softened in any way out the most visceral and violent men that has taken root. A NZI, generalizing it can be said that not only is Christianity not improve man, but where the power meets a perverse will, justify inhumane acts through the conviction of possessing the Truth.

not a bad person does not operate if evil is not a Christian, but Christianity can serve as an alibi, as has already happened. The purpose of the Inquisition was to eradicate heresy, and then demonic evil, and to fight the evil they perpetrated horrors difficult to imagine (in Nazi Germany, evil was embodied by the Jews, and Communist Russia, by landowners and supporters of the capitalist model, in both cases, the killings were necessary as a struggle against evil). The key point of the matter is, however, this: Christianity itself is not a message of violence, but in the mind of a fanatic the execution of an absolute ideal as the Christian can justify the use of any means. E 'the same mechanism by which, for example, an Islamic fundamentalist believes right to kill people belonging to different cultural systems from your . Ultimately, the evils perpetrated in the name of religion can not be attributed to religion, but it provides the motive of action of the fanatic.

L theories and dogmatic, absolute truth would cause unique all-encompassing reality, which do not allow revisions and dissident voices, and the conviction of their truth becomes a license to act in any way the particular (concrete) in the name of the absolute (which may be God or any ideal).

In response to (MP), we can say with certainty that religion not only is of no practical utility, as fails to inhibit, as it proposes to do, not even the most destructive side of man, but is also bad because it is ideological in the sense of vision sole and absolute reality.

A quest to design culturally we must oppose a dictatorship individualistic thought which is capable of continuous movement, or which is able to problematize and transform itself, and at the same time be open to encounter mutual with other models of thought, which is, after all, the right mindset of those who wants to put out to try, with passion and honesty, his truth. Reciprocity and openness to the problematic nature are qualities that are lacking in any religion, which instead arises with a view to otherness hierarchical, closed and dogmatic, and if the only truth can not be discussed and is written in the dogmas, then there is nothing you can do but accept it or fight it in its entirety. Choose to fight it is the first step to confront freely and individually with the big questions that surround the life of each one, choose to fight it means to regain possession of the great themes of the man who for too long been monopolized by the Christian doctors. And d oppose the dogma must be the first step towards the construction of many new ways and meanings.